Not releasing prisoners a criminally dumb idea
Mar 18, 2010 | 398 views | 2 2 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Editor:

The federal judiciary has ordered the state of California to reduce its prison population to alleviate severe overcrowding. Because of bad management and incredibly sweet union contracts for guards, the cost of warehousing inmates in California prisons approaches the room rate of the Four Seasons hotels. Prison guards in California make almost 2½ times what a five-year veteran elementary school teacher makes. Go figure.

The answer is not to build more expensive prisons staffed by overpaid guards, nor is it to farm out the prison management to a for-profit private company. The term “for-profit” should be self explanatory here.

The answer is to carefully cull the prison inmate population to manageable numbers. Release the poor slob serving time for possessing a joint, release the first-time non-violent offenders who were railroaded by overzealous district attorneys and overworked, poor-performing public defenders. Release the ones who are not a threat to me or my neighbors and are costing the taxpayers a fortune to keep inside.

The courts have ordered the reduction in prison population; it’s up to us, the taxpayers, to see that the reduction is handled well. At the risk of repeating myself: The answer is not building more prisons staffed with very expensive guards!

And while we are talking about overpaid public employees, let’s take a hard look at the Brentwood Union School District. To give Dr. Grant and his cronies a raise in these tough economic times is almost criminal! Dr. Grant is way overpaid already while the ‘in the trenches” teachers work long hours in overcrowded classrooms with pay scales that make burger flipping look good. You should be ashamed of yourself, Merrill!

Maybe it is time for the community to take a long, hard look at the school board members and their relationships with these three overpaid administrators?

And finally: How about we try something really novel here in Brentwood? Let’s widen Balfour out to Deer Valley without approving 1,300-plus new homes. And while we are at it, let’s make the Highway 4 Bypass four lanes from Lone Tree to Balfour like it should have been all along. The planning and execution of road and street building here in Brentwood has been a disaster for at least the last 10 years.

Bill Sumner, Brentwood
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Julie M
|
March 21, 2010
Releasing inmates seems like a good idea on the surface, but then the obvious questions arise - Where are they going to work? Even people without felony convictions can't find jobs in this economy. Most of the former inmates will go on public assistance (doing no more than shifting the cost of supporting them from the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation to other government agencies), and return to selling drugs, committing robberies, and engaging in other crimes to support themselves. And how are they going to get the healthcare that most of them need as a result of the lifestyles they've chosen? I'm currently working on a case against an inmate who paroled at the end of January. He ran out of medication for his diabetes and heart conditions 30 days after his release, so what did he do? He committed a crime so he could go back to prison and get free medication and healthcare. Releasing inmates will be a revolving door that will drive up the cost - to taxpayers - of law enforcement and prosecutions. Taxpayers will have to pay to support felons and most former-felons no matter where they live. As for me, I'd rather have them locked up where they don't present an immediate threat to my safety and my property.
Frances Webster
|
March 20, 2010
I really like your last paragraph. The things you mentioned seem like no brainers to me but obviousley there are other people who don't think like I do.

Haven't these people driven around their neighborshoods lately and seen all of the For Sale signs? Why don't they put a temporary building freeze on until the number of houses on the market is a more reasonable amount. I saw the Brentwood Housing Statistics for Feb 2010 and 78% of the houses sold were distressed sales. The value of our homes cannot increase while there is such an overabundance of homes for sale. People are being forced to walk away from their homes because the value has decreased so drastically. We paid $800,000 for our home in 2005 and it is worth around $300,000 today. That's insane. We don't plan to walk away from it because we love our home and our community. Not everyone can do this.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of thepress.net.